Needed: A Democratic Shadow Cabinet

Donald Trump, precisely because his behavior is so outlandish and unpredictable, has dominated the news coverage. It?s unreality TV, and the media can?t stop covering it.

The benefit is that Trump?s sheer craziness gets a lot of scrutiny. But the downside is that Democratic critics have trouble getting much airtime.

If this were a parliamentary democracy, there would be a leader of the opposition, and a whole ?front bench? of opposition spokespeople, issue by issue ? a kind of Shadow Cabinet.

Leading Democrats could both hold Trump accountable for his bizarre positions (and those of his Republican allies in Congress), and the Democrats could also offer more attractive alternatives. 

They could also show up Trump?s sheer ignorance of the issues, and his crazy inconsistency, and hold him accountable, item by item.

Once a week, the Democratic front bench could hold its own press briefing; and particular spokespeople could be the ones to whom the media would turn. The press would have to cover this, much as they cover Sean Spicer?s zany White House briefings?and the contrast would be startling. The bizarre versus the normal. Fact versus fantasy.

So? time to think outside the box. Here?s the idea: House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate leader Chuck Schumer and the new Democratic National Committee chair, Tom Perez, should put their heads together and appoint a Shadow Cabinet.

They would need to confer with colleagues to accommodate egos, of course. And there would be some jockeying for position. But this is a national emergency. I don?t think this would be all that hard.

The Trump/Republican policies are so crazy ? that the more that Democrats are able to expose them and pose alternatives, the more the sheer unpopularity of Trump?s agenda will be evident.

Even better would be if a leading Democrat put herself forward now, as the presidential candidate for 2020. That way, there would be head-to-head comparisons and challenges, as well as almost equal coverage. 

Well, that?s probably too much to hope for. The next Democratic candidate is not going to be nominated by acclamation. Also, Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown, two likely Democratic standard bearers, first need to get re-elected in 2018, Brown in Ohio and Warren in Massachusetts. 

Of course, if she declared for president now, Warren could explain to Massachusetts voters that she is running for re-election to the Senate not just to represent the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, but to position herself to rid the country of Trump.

In normal times, that would seem arrogant or opportunist. But these are not normal times. 

What better way to serve the citizens of Massachusetts than to oust Trump? That would be one terrific speech, and would win plaudits for sheer gumption.

Okay, I get that this is a long shot. I?d settle for a Shadow Cabinet with regular press briefings. What about it, Dems?


Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and professor at Brandeis University?s Heller School. His latest book is Debtors? Prison: The Politics of Austerity Versus Possibility. 

Like Robert Kuttner on Facebook.

Follow Robert Kuttner on Twitter.

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Alec Baldwin: ‘Just To Clean Up The Mess’ After Trump Will Be ‘Almost Impossible’

Alec Baldwin?s Twitter presence is infamous enough to both warrant a ?South Park? parody and a loving moniker from his longtime friend Tina Fey. In an interview Fey did with David Letterman for The Hollywood Reporter after the election, she talked about Donald Trump?s mistake in feuding with Baldwin on the social media platform.

?You think you?re good at being a jerk on Twitter? You will now face the grandmaster of being a jerk on Twitter,? joked Fey.

The Huffington Post?s Bill Bradley caught up with Baldwin before the ACLU?s March 31 ?Stand For Rights? benefit to ask what how the actor would approach Twitter if he somehow became president.

?I don?t think I would do Twitter if I was the president of the United States,? Baldwin first said, before explaining that he sees value in having a social media team post speeches and other formal messages.

Baldwin, who?s keeping busy impersonating the 45th president on ?Saturday Night Live,? then launched into a Trump impression, saying he wouldn?t send tweets like, ?The failing New York Times is terrible.?

?I think that?s crazy,? he said.

Baldwin went on to further express concern over the current administration:

But I think that the president, especially now, there?s so many problems we?re going to have to undo. I mean, when Trump is gone, to undo [this] will be like one of these flood zones. It will be like when a tsunami hits a town. Just to clean up the mess these people have made is going to be almost impossible.

HuffPost is currently streaming the ?Stand For Rights? benefit on Facebook

Ready to give? Text POWER to 20222 to donate $10 to the ACLU. The ACLU will call to explain other actions you can take to help. (Terms here.) You can also support ?Stand for Rights: A Benefit for the ACLU? by heading to the ACLU website

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.